Source CNN
KNOW THE FULL STORY ABOUT HONG KONG PROTESTS
The 2019 Hong Kong protests, also known as Anti-Extradition
Law Amendment Bill (ELAB) Movement, are an ongoing series of demonstrations
in Hong Kong, China which
began with the aim to oppose the introduction of the Fugitive
Offenders amendment bill proposed by the Hong Kong government. If
enacted, the bill will allow local authorities to detain and extradite
criminal fugitives who are
wanted in territories with which Hong Kong does not currently have extradition
agreements, including Taiwan and mainland China.[24] People
were concerned that the bill would subject Hong Kong citizens and visitors to
the mainland Chinese jurisdiction, undermining the autonomy of the
region and its civil liberties. As the protests
progressed, the protesters laid out five key demands, including over the alleged police misconduct and democratic
reform which has stagnated since the 2014 Umbrella
Revolution. The Chinese central government has
stated it is "the worst crisis in Hong Kong" since the handover in 1997.
Demonstrations against the bill began in March and April and
turned into consecutive mass movements in June. Hundreds of thousands of
people marched against the bill on 9 June. Protests on 12 June, the day on
which the bill was scheduled for a second reading in the Legislative Council,
marked a sharp escalation in violence. Riot police deployed tear gas and rubber bullets against groups of
demonstrators, but protesters successfully stalled the passage of the
bill. Organisers claimed two million attended, while the police reported
that 338,000 people marched at its peak on 16 June, the day after Chief Executive Carrie Lam suspended the bill.
On 1 July, the 22nd anniversary of the handover, hundreds of
thousands of people participated in the annual July march.
A portion of these demonstrators split from the march and broke into the Legislative Council
Complex, vandalising central government symbols. Subsequently,
the protests have continued throughout the summer, escalating into increasingly
violent confrontations involving the police, activists on both sides,
suspected triad gangs,
rioters, and local residents in over 20 different neighbourhoods throughout the
region. 21 July marked the Yuen Long attack where
organised triad members assaulted on protesters and bystanders, which
heightened the tension. Subsequent police operations and alleged misconduct
prompted a general strike and a city-wide protests on 5 August. About
1.7 million people (organisers' estimate) also attended a rally condemning
police brutality on 18 August. Inspired by the Baltic Way, an estimated 210,000 people created
"The Hong Kong Way", a
human chain 50 kilometres long. There were also pro-police rallies that
attracted hundreds of thousands Hong Kong residents to attend.
Lam suspended the extradition bill on 15 June and declared
the bill "dead" on 9 July, but fell short of a full withdrawal until
4 September. However, she refused to concede any of the other four demands,
namely an independent inquiry on police brutality, the release of arrested
protesters, a complete retraction of the official characterisation of the
protests as "riots", and universal suffrage of the Legislative
Council and the Chief Executive, and her resignation.
Background
Direct cause
The Fugitive Offenders and Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal
Matters Legislation (Amendment) Bill 2019 was first proposed by
the government of Hong
Kong on February 2019 in response to the 2018 murder of Poon
Hiu-wing by her boyfriend Chan Tong-kai in Taiwan, where the two Hong Kong residents were
visiting as tourists. As there is no extradition treaty with Taiwan (because
the government of China does
not recognise its sovereignty),
the Hong Kong government proposed an amendment to the Fugitive Offenders
Ordinance (Cap. 503) and Mutual Legal Assistance in
Criminal Matters Ordinance (Cap. 525) to establish a mechanism for
case-by-case transfers of fugitives, on the order of the Chief Executive,
to any jurisdiction with which the city lacks a formal extradition
treaty. One such jurisdiction would be mainland China.
The inclusion of mainland China in the amendment is of
concern to different sectors of Hong Kong society. Pro-democracy advocates fear
the removal of the separation of the region's jurisdiction from mainland
Chinese laws administered by the Communist Party,
thereby eroding the "one country, two
systems" principle in practice since the 1997 handover.
Opponents of the bill urged the Hong Kong government to explore other avenues,
such as establishing an extradition arrangement solely with Taiwan, and
to sunset the
arrangement immediately after the surrender of the suspect.
Underlying causes
2019 Hong Kong protests came four and a half years after
the Umbrella Revolution in
2014, which began after the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (NPCSC)
had issued a decision regarding proposed reforms to
the Hong Kong electoral system, which was largely seen as
restrictive. However, despite mass rallies, the government did not make any
concession and the movement ended in failure. Since then, there has been
no progress in achieving genuine universal suffrage; only
half of the seats in the Legislative Council remain directly elected, and the
Chief Executive of Hong Kong continues to be voted by the small-circle Election Committee.
Following the failed protests, the 2017 imprisonment of Hong Kong democracy activists further
dashed the city's hope of advancing democractic development. People began
to fear the loss of the "high degree of autonomy" provided for in
the Hong Kong Basic Law, as
the government of the People's Republic of China appeared to be increasingly
and overtly interfering with Hong Kong's affairs. Notably, the Hong Kong Legislative Council oath-taking controversy ended
with the disqualification of six lawmakers following a ruling by courts in
Mainland China; the Causeway Bay Books
disappearances sparked concerns for state-sanctioned rendition
and extrajudicial
detention.
The rise of localism and
the pro-independence movement
was marked by the campaign for the 2016 New
Territories East by-election by activist Edward Leung as fewer and fewer Hong Kong
youths identify themselves as Chinese due to the legal, social and cultural
differences between Hong Kong and mainland China. Pollsters at the University of Hong
Kong found that the younger they were, the more distrustful
they were towards the Central government. Hong Kong youth had already
faced political turmoil since the Moral and
National Education controversy in 2012, and they were no longer
confident in the systems which supposedly protected their rights. With the
approach of 2047, when the Basic Law is set to expire, and along with it the
constitutional guarantees enshrined within it, sentiments of an uncertain
future drove youth to join the protests against the extradition bill.
For some protesters, the Umbrella Revolution was an
inspiration that brought about a political awakening for them. Others felt
that peaceful methods were not effective and resorted to using more radical
methods to express their view. Both CNN and The Guardian noted that unlike the
2014 protests, protesters in 2019 were driven by a sense of desperation rather
than hope, and that the aims of the protests have evolved from withdrawing
the bill to fighting for greater freedom and liberties.
Objectives
Protesters initially solely demanded the withdrawal of the
extradition bill. Following an escalation in the severity of policing tactics
against demonstrators on 12 June and the bill's suspension on 15 June, the
objective of the protesters has been to achieve these five demands:
Demand
|
Rationale
|
Complete withdrawal of the extradition bill from the
legislative process
|
Although Chief Executive announced indefinite suspension
of the bill on 15 June, reading on it may be quickly resumed. The bill was
"pending resumption of second reading" in the Legislative
Council. On 4 September, Carrie Lam announced that the formal
withdrawal of the bill will be processed by Secretary for
Security John Lee in
the Legislative Council later.
|
Retraction of the "riot" characterisation
|
The government originally characterised the 12 June
protest as "riots". Later the description was amended to say there
were "some" protesters who rioted. However, protesters contest the
existence of acts of rioting during the 12 June protest.
|
Release and exoneration of arrested protesters
|
Protesters consider the arrests to be politically
motivated; they also question the legitimacy of police arresting protesters
at hospitals through access to their confidential medical data in breach of
patient privacy.
|
Establishment of an independent commission of inquiry into
police conduct and use of force during the protests
|
Civic groups felt that the level of violence used by the
police on 12 June, specifically those against protesters who were not
committing any offences when they were set upon, was unjustified; police
performing stop-and-search to numerous passers-by near the protest site
without probable cause was also considered abusive.[61] Some
officers' failure to display or show their police identification number or
warrant card despite being required to do so by the Police General Orders is
seen to be a breakdown of accountability.[62] The
existing watchdog lacks independence, and its functioning relies on police
cooperation.
|
Resignation of Carrie Lam and the implementation of
universal suffrage for Legislative
Council and Chief Executive elections[63]
|
Currently, the Chief Executive is selected by a
1,200-member Election Committee, and
30 of the 70 Legislative Council seats are filled by limited electorates that
represent different sectors of the economy, forming the majority of the
so-called functional
constituencies.
|
On 30 August, Reuters reported that Carrie Lam had
presented a report to the Central Coordination Group for Hong Kong and Macau Affairs,
in which the Hong Kong government analysed the protesters' five main demands
and assessed that withdrawing the extradition bill and retracting the term
"riot" could help quell the unrest. However, the Chinese government
refused to allow Lam to make any concessions and instead insisted she took more
initiative. One senior Chinese officialsaid that President Xi was directly
aware of the situation.[64] This
story, however, was rejected as "completely fake news" by Global Times editor Hu Xijin, who tweeted that he highly suspected
that it was "a public opinion war launched maliciously by Reuters at a
crucial time".
History
Early stage
The Civil Human Rights
Front, a platform for 50 pro-democracy groups,
launched a protest march against the bill on 31 March and another on 28 April.
While police estimated 22,800 protesters, organisers claimed 130,000
participants. The latter figure was the highest since the estimated 510,000
that organisers claimed joined the annual 1 July protest in
2014. The anti-extradition issue attracted more attention when
pro-democratic Legislative Councilors launched a filibuster campaign against the bill. In
response, the Secretary of Security John Lee announced
that the government would resume the second reading of the bill in a full
Legislative Council meeting on 12 June, bypassing the Bills Committee, whose
role was scrutinising the bill. The government's determination to pass the
extradition bill, with Carrie Lam accusing the opposition of "talking
trash", and the Taiwan government rejecting HKSAR's plan for extradition,
also attracted significant media attention.
With the second reading of the bill scheduled for 12 June,
the CHRF launched their third protest march from Victoria Park to the
Legislative Council in Admiralty on 9 June. While Police estimated an
ettendance of 270,000, the organisers claimed that 1.03 million people
attended the rally. Carrie Lam demanded the second reading debate on the
bill be resumed on 12 June, causing several student groups and the
political party Demosistō to stage a
sit-in outside the Legislative Council Complex. Police forced them to retreat
to Wan Chai.
The general strike called for 12 June was observed by over
100 employers. Riot police dispersed protesters at the Legislative Council
building by firing tear gas, beanbag rounds and rubber bullets. Police
Commissioner Stephen Lo declared
the clashes a "riot", although the police itself were
subsequently condemned for using excessive force – tear gas was fired at
peaceful protesters cornered in a crowded area next to CITIC Tower, trapping inside the building.
There was controversy over the use of batons and tear gas, alleged assaults on
journalists by police, and the lack of identifying numbers on police
officers; the subsequent arrests in hospitals were also
criticised. The clashes that day provoked protesters to begin asking for
an independent inquiry on police brutality and urging the government to retract
the "riot" characterisation. 2,000 protesters from religious groups
held a vigil outside the government headquarters, praying and singing hymns
including "Sing Hallelujah to
the Lord", which became an unofficial anthem.
On 15 June, Carrie Lam announced that the suspension of the
bill, though the pro-democratic camp had demanded a full withdrawal of the bill. A
35-year-old man committed suicide in protest at Lam's decision. CHRF
claimed a record-breaking "almost 2 million plus 1 citizens" had
participated in the 16 June protest, while the police estimated that there were
338,000 demonstrators at its peak. Carrie Lam apologised to Hong Kong
citizens for failing to properly communicate the bill's purpose and not holding
public consultations but refused to either resign or withdraw the bill.
Protesters began to besiege the Police Headquarters on
Arsenal Street on 21 and 24 June. The police took no action to disperse the
gathered crowds Protesters also began to call for international support by
visiting the consulates of member states of the G20 expected
at the Osaka summit; they assembled at Edinburgh Place at night, holding signs
that read "Democracy now" and "Free Hong Kong"
Protests "blossoming everywhere"
The CHRF held the annual march on
1 July and claimed a record turnout of 550,000 while police placed the estimate
around 190,000. The protest was largely peaceful. At night, protesters
stormed the Legislative Council Complex, but the police took little action to
stop them. Protesters smashed furniture, defaced the Hong Kong emblem, and
presented a new manifesto with ten points. Some of the protesters who
stormed the LegCo Complex were motivated by the desperation stemmed from
several more cases of suicides since 15 June. Carrie Lam condemned the
protesters who stormed the council.
Following the 1 July protest, protests began to
"blossom everywhere", with protests being held in different
areas in Hong Kong, both protesting against the extradition bill and local
issues, including parallel traders from China in Sheung Shui. Lennon Walls were also set up in different
neighbourhoods and became a source of conflict between pro-Beijing citizens and
supporters of the protests. The first anti-extradition protest in Kowloon was
held on 7 July, where protesters marched from Tsim Sha Tsui to West Kowloon station. Clashes
occurred later in Tsim Sha Tsui and Mong Kok. The police's failure to display
their warrant cards drew
criticism. On 9 July, Carrie Lam declared "the bill is dead",
though her choice of Cantonese phrases was ambiguous and non-legally binding,
leading to further doubt and scepticism.
The first anti-extradition protest in the New Territories
was held in Sha Tin on 14 July. The protest was
largely peaceful, though some protesters began to set up barricades and threw
objects at the police after the protest. Protesters later moved to New Town Plaza and attempted to leave
via Sha Tin station, though
they were stopped by riot police who blocked them. Protesters and bystanders
then became trapped inside the Plaza, and intense clashes between protesters
and police officers occurred inside. Residents unhappy with the incident
gathered at New Town Plaza in the following days, questioning security officers
why Sun Hung Kai
Properties allowed the police to enter the plaza without any
proper permit.
Attention shifted back to Hong Kong Island when the CHRF held
another anti-extradition protest on 21 July. Protesters advanced past the
police-mandated endpoint, and some protesters surrounded the Hong Kong Liaison
Office and defaced the Chinese national emblem, an act that was
condemned by the government. While a standoff between the protesters and
the police occurred in Sheung Wan, white-clad
groups, suspected to be triad members allegedly supported by pro-Beijing
lawmaker Junius Ho, appeared
at Yuen Long station and indiscriminately
attacked people inside the station. Yuen Long became a ghost town following the attack and the
police's sluggish response to the incident sparked public's outrage.
On 27 July, protesters marched to Yuen Long, despite
opposition from rural groups and police's objection. To disperse the
protesters, the police fired tear gas in a primarily residential area and
the stand-offs between the protesters and the police escalated into violent
clashes inside Yuen Long station. On the next day, protesters once again
defied the police ban and marched to Sai Wan and Causeway Bay. 49 people were arrested and later
charged with rioting. To support the arrestees, protesters besieged
the Kwai Chung police station and the Tin Shui Wai police station, where
protesters were attacked by fireworks launching out of a moving vehicle.
In July, several peaceful protests were held. A group of
elderly marched on Hong Kong Island to show their solidarity with the
youths. Several hunger strikers also marched to Government House to demand a response from
Carrie Lam. On 26 July, thousands of protesters gathered at Hong Kong
International Airport and handed out leaflets and pamphlets
about the controversy to tourists.
Escalation
Protesters returned to Mong Kok on 3 August, though some
protesters did not follow the designated routes and headed to Mong Kok and Tsim
Sha Tsui. Protesters moved barricades into the toll plaza of the Cross-Harbour Tunnel in Hung Hom, blocking vehicles. A small group
of protesters also threw the Chinese national flag next to the Star Ferry pier into Victoria Harbour. The arrest of protesters
in Wong Tai Sin angered
the local residents, who clashed with police near the Disciplined Services
quarters. The next day, two protests were held, one in Tseung Kwan O and another in Kennedy Town. Clashes between the police and
protesters then occurred in various districts in Hong Kong.
5th August saw one of the city's biggest general strikes,
which was answered by 350,000 people according to the Confederation
of Trade Unions. Over 200 flights were cancelled due to the
strike. Some protesters also blocked traffic to stop people from getting
to work. Protests and sit-ins were held in seven districts in Hong Kong,
including Admiralty, Sha Tin, Tuen Mun, Tsuen Wan, Wong Tai Sin, Mong Kok and Tai Po. To disperse the protesters, the
police force used more than 800 canisters of tear gas, a record number for Hong
Kong. Protesters in North Point and Tsuen Wan were attacked by two groups of
stick-wielding men, though some fought back the attackers.
From 6–7 August, after the Hong Kong Baptist
University Student Union president Fong Chung-yin was arrested
in Sham Shui Po for
possession of "offensive weapons", which were found to be laser pens, residents nearby besieged the
police station and protesters gathered outside Hong Kong Space
Museum to shine laser pointers on the wall of the museum.
On 11 August, protesters returned to New Territories for a
protest in Tai Po, though they spread to other places in
Hong Kong in the evening. On the next day, two protests were held, one
in Sham Shui Po while
another in Eastern District.
Protesters in Sham Shui Po later moved to Tsim Sha Tsui, where the police
ruptured the right eye of a female first-aider using bean bag
rounds, and Kwai Chung, where the
police used tear gas indoors. Meanwhile, the protest on Hong Kong Island
escalated into violence when undercover police officers were found arresting
other protesters in Causeway Bay. Police
officers also fired pepper ball rounds at protesters at a very close range
in Tai Koo station.
The alleged police brutality on 11 August prompted
protesters to stage a three-day sit-in at Hong Kong International Airport from
12 to 14 August, prompting the Airport Authority to
cancel numerous flights for at least two days. In separate incidents on 13
August, protesters at the Airport cornered and assaulted two men accused of being
either undercover police or agents for the mainland, one of whom was later
confirmed as being a reporter for the Global Times. Responding to the 11
August incident, a peaceful rally was held in Victoria Park by
the CHRF on 18 August to condemn police brutality and reiterate the five core
demands. It attracted at least 1.7 million people, who, despite a police
ban, marched to Central. An additional estimated 300,000 protesters
marched between Central and Causeway Bay, but could not enter the park due to
overcrowding. The police put the attendance in Victoria Park football areas at
128,000 at the peak.
On the evening of 23 August, an estimated 210,000 people
participated in "The Hong Kong Way"
campaign, to draw attention to the movement's five demands.
At 9 pm, many covered their right eye and chanted "Corrupt cops,
return the eye" in reference to the first-aid worker who suffered a
serious eye injury during a protest on 12 August. They joined hands to
create a human chain 50 kilometres long, stretching across both sides of Hong Kong harbour and over the top
of Lion Rock. The action was inspired by a
similar event known as the Baltic Way Chain of Freedom that occurred
on 23 August 1989.
On 24 August, protesters marched to Kwun Tong and dismantled a smart lamppost
which was allegedly used by Hong Kong government to monitor its
citizens. Railway operator MTR closed various stations before
the protest, causing it to become a target of vandalism in subsequent
protests. During the protests of 25 August in Tsuen Wan and Kwai Tsing Districts,
hardline protesters threw bricks and gasoline bombs toward the police, who in
turn responded by firing tear gas and deploying water cannon trucks. After
being chased and attacked by protesters, six officers then pulled out their
pistols and one of them fired a warning shot toward the sky – this marked the
first time a live round had been used since the demonstrations broke out in
June. The police also kicked a kneeling man who was attempting to persuade
the officers not to shoot.
Ignoring a police ban and the recent arrests of
high-profile pro-democracy activists and lawmakers, thousands of protesters
took to the streets of Hong Kong Island on 31 August. The 13th weekend of the
protests also marked the 5th anniversary of China's announcement of the
democratisation timetable of Hong Kong, which triggered the months-long Umbrella Revolution protests
of 2014. Two warning shots were fired by undercover cops in Victoria
Park. Amnesty
International called for an investigation into the police
conduct after the Special Tactical Squad stormed the Prince Edward
station and beat and pepper-sprayed the commuters
inside. MTR, which was also heavily criticised, refused to release CCTV
footage at that night.
Many among civil servants, teachers, lawyers, social
workers, the finance sector, accountants, secondary school students, and
medical professionals have voiced support for the anti-extradition movement in
August by holding marches or rallies. Hong Kong people also organised
various rallies to protest against the police's alleged use of sexual violence,
condemn airline Cathay Pacific for
spreading white terror on its hard-line approach to staff who participated in
protests, and urge the UK and US to support the movement.
On 1 September, the target of protesters was the Hong Kong
International Airport. Hundreds of protesters fled to the neighbouring Tung Chung district, and with transport
suspended by MTR, some protesters walked a 15 km route on the highway to
the urban area from Lantau Island. The
mass evacuation was dubbed by some media as "Hong Kong's Dunkirk".
On 2 and 3 September, thousands of school and university
students boycotted classes on the first two days of the new term to join the
protests. The police's actions near the schools and some schools'
responses to the class boycotts received public attention. Rallies were
held on Hong Kong Island for
people who participated in the general strike. Protesters besieged the Mong Kok
police station from 2 to 6 September for four consecutive days to condemn the
police brutality inside Prince Edward Station on 31 August and to demand
the MTR Corporation to
release the CCTV footage of that night. One person was knocked unconscious by
the police on 3 September.
Also on 2 September, Reuters received a leaked audio recording
in which Carrie Lam admitted that she had "very limited" room to
manoeuvre between the Central People's Government and Hong Kong, and that she
would quit, if she had a choice. However, the next day she told the media
that she had never tendered her resignation.
Decision to withdraw the bill
On 4 September, Carrie Lam announced that she would formally
withdraw the extradition bill in October and that she would introduce
additional measures to help calm the situation. Her concession was criticised
by protestors as "too little, too late".Protests continued after the
withdrawal of the bill. On 9 September, students wearing uniforms and masks
formed a human chain to support the protests that occurred over the weekend.
On 10 September, protesters defied the Chinese law by booing
China's national anthem before a football World Cup qualifier and sang the
protest anthem "Glory to Hong Kong"
instead. On the night of September 11, thousands of protesters gathered in many
shopping malls all over Hong Kong, chanting and singing "Glory to Hong
Kong".
Tactics and methods
The 2019 Hong Kong protests have been largely described as
"leaderless", although the Civil Human Rights
Front organised several marches and rallies. No group or
political party has claimed leadership over the movement. They mainly played a
supportive role, such as applying for Letters of No Objection from the police
or mediating conflicts between protesters and police officers. Protesters
commonly used LIHKG, an online forum similar to Reddit, and Telegram, an optionally
end-to-end encrypted messaging service similar to Whatsapp, to communicate and brainstorm ideas
for protests and make collective decisions.
Protesters also upheld several praxis. The first one was "be water",
which originated from Bruce Lee's philosophy.
Protesters often moved in a mobile and agile fashion so that the police found
it more difficult to respond. Protesters often retreated when the police
arrived, though they would reemerge somewhere else. Unlike previous
protests which were confined to the Hong Kong Island, the 2019 protests were
diversified in locations, with over 20 different neighbourhoods throughout Hong
Kong Island, Kowloon and the New Territories witnessing protests. In
addition, protesters adopted the black bloc method. They wore mostly black
face masks to protect against tear gas and their identities. Furthermore,
protesters used a range of methods to counter the police force. They used laser pointers to distract police
officers, sprayed paint on surveillance cameras, and unfurled umbrellas to
protect and conceal the identities of the group in action and to defeat facial
recognition technologies.
There are mainly two groups of protesters, namely the "peaceful,
rational and non-violent" (Chinese: 和理非) protesters and the "fighters" group (Chinese: 勇武). The "peaceful group" participated in
different ways. Some chanted slogans and sang songs such as "Glory to Hong Kong"
and "Sing Hallelujah to
the Lord". Some of them volunteered as
medic, started hunger strikes, formed human chains, started
petition campaigns, organised general strikes, obstructed public transport
services as an act of civil disobedience launched
boycotts against pro-Beijing shops and organisations, create derivative works mocking the police and
the government, create posters for protests, and set up Lennon Walls in
various districts and neighbourhoods in Hong Kong. On the other hand, the
more radical protesters snuffed out tear gas, confronted the police, besieged
police stations, set up roadblocks, threw tear gas canisters back to the
police, organised flash mob occupation
of major thoroughfares near the Cross-Harbour Tunnel, and
sometimes committed vandalism by spraying
graffiti, hurling eggs at pro-Beijing lawmakers' offices, damaging the
gates inside MTR stations, defacing symbols representing
China, throwing bricks, and committing arson. Some protesters
also doxxed and cyberbullied police officers and their
families and uploaded their personal information online. Nonetheless,
despite difference in methods, both groups have refrained from denouncing or
criticising the other. The principle was the "Do Not Split" praxis,
which was aimed to promote mutual respect for different views within the same
protest movement.
To raise awareness of their demands, some protesters have
also raised funds to place advertisement in major international
newspapers, and waved the U.S. flag and
the Union Jack. They
also organised press conferences to "broadcast under-represented
voices" and their own perspectives to the public to counter the police's
and the government's conferences. Protesters also attempted to inform
tourists about the protests of Hong Kong by staging sit-ins at Hong Kong
International Airport and using Apple devices' AirDrop feature to broadcast
anti-extradition bill information to the public and mainland tourists. Pepe the Frog has been widely used as a
symbol of liberty and resistance, and the #Eye4HK campaign, which showed
solidarity for a female whose eye was allegedly ruptured with a beanbag shot by
the police, gained international momentum around the world.
Suicides
There were eight suicide cases that linked to the
anti-extradition bill protests. 5 suicide cases were caused by the extradition
bill, and 3 can be attributed to events that follow the extradition
bill. Some of the deceased had left a suicide note that deplored the
unelected and unresponsive government and the insistence by officials to force
through the extradition bill; most of the individuals expressed despondency
whilst urging Hongkongers to continue their fight. One note even stated:
"What Hong Kong needs is a revolution."
The first person committed suicide on 15 June, when
35-year-old Marco Leung Ling-kit climbed the elevated podium on the rooftop
of Pacific Place,
a shopping mall in Admiralty at 4:30 pm. Wearing a yellow raincoat
with the words "Brutal police are cold-blooded" and "Carrie Lam
is killing Hong Kong" in Chinese written on the back, he hung a banner on
the scaffolding with several anti-extradition slogans. After a five-hour
standoff, during which police officers and Democratic Party legislator Roy Kwong attempted to talk him down,
Leung fell to his death, missing an inflatable cushion set up by firefighters.
A shrine appeared at the scene soon afterward; Ai Weiwei shared the news on his Instagram
feed, while Chinese satirist Badiucao honoured the dead man with a
cartoon. On Thursday 11 July another vigil was held, in which thousands
turned up leaving sunflowers at the memorial site. Artists in Prague have also honoured the event, and
painted a memorial on the Lennon Wall in the Czech Republic,
depicting a yellow raincoat along with words of well wishes.
A 21-year-old Education University
of Hong Kong student, Lo Hiu-yan, jumped to her death
from Ka Fuk Estate in Fanling on 29 June. She had left two
notes written on a stairwell wall with red marker, and uploaded photos of her
note to Instagram. A third suicide occurred the next day when a
29-year-old woman, Zhita Wu, jumped from the International
Financial Centre. On 4 July, a 28-year-old woman only identified by the
surname Mak died after jumping off a building in Cheung Sha Wan. A fifth
suicide occurred on 22 July, a 26-year-old man identified by the surname Fan
died after jumping off the building of Cypress House, Kwong Yuen Estate after an argument with
his parents about his political stance and being driven out of the house.
Neighbours of Fan left flowers near the site.
Allegations of police misconduct
During the protests, the Hong Kong Police
Force have been accused of various misconducts. The Independent
Police Complaints Council (IPCC) has launched investigations into alleged
police misconducts in the protests, although the protesters call for
forming an independent commission of inquiry, as the members of the IPCC are
mainly pro-establishment. Carrie Lam has rejected this demand and
had allegedly claimed that she would not "betray" the Force.
Hong Kong police were accused of using excessive force, such
as using rubber bullets dangerously by aiming horizontally, targeting the heads
and the torsal of protesters. Its use of bean bag rounds allegedly ruptured the eye
of a female protester, and the police's use of pepper ball rounds in Tai Koo station was described as
"execution-styled shooting".[231] The
police insisted that its usage aligned with international standard and that the
injury of the female protester was not caused by the police. Its use of tear
gas was criticised for violating the international safety guidelines, as the
police were found using it as an offensive weapon, firing it indoors, and
using expired tear gas, which may release toxic gases such as phosgene and cyanide upon combustion according to
academics. Its usage in densely populated residential areas also attracted
criticisms from affected residents. Some bystanders caught up in the protests
were beaten up or kicked by officers, and operations at New Town
Plaza, Yuen Long station, Tai Koo station, Kwai Fong station, and Prince Edward
station, where the STS squad assaulted commuters on a train, were
thought to have been a disregard for public safety by protesters and
pro-democrats.
The kettling of
protesters during the Sha Tin protests, the operations inside private
areas, the deployment of undercover officers, the
suspected tampering with evidence, the denial of first-aid services for
the wounded,[238] and
how the police displayed their warning signs were also controversial. As
some police officers did not wear uniforms with identification numbers or
failed to display their warrant cards, it was difficult for
citizens to file complaints. Police were also accused of using excessive force
on already subdued arrestees. There were reports that accused the police
of mistreating and sexually abusing the detainees. A female protester had
her crotch exposed during her arrest. Some detainees reported that the
police had denied them access to lawyers.
The police were accused of interfering with press freedom,
injuring journalists, and obstructing them during various protests.[ The
police was also accused of spreading white terror by conducting hospital
arrests, banning several requests for demonstrations, and arresting
multiple high-profile activists and lawmakers. Its inaction during the
storming of the Legislative Council
Complex was seen as a divisive tactic. Its slow response
towards the Yuen Long and North Point attacks sparked accusations
that the police had colluded with triad members. Some lawyers have pointed out
that their refusal to help the victims as they shut the gates of the nearby
police stations during the Yuen Long attacks might be an offence of misconduct in public
office. The police have denied all of these accusations.
The personal conduct of some officers was also criticised.
Some uniformed officers used foul language to harass protesters and
journalists, and some officers were accused of provoking the protesters. The
Junior Police Officers' Association also used the term "cockroaches"
to describe the radical protesters – the usage of which has been historically
controversial, used to describe people seen as inferior during both World War II and the Rwandan genocide.
Following these allegations of misconduct, a poll by Hong
Kong Public Opinion Research Institute in August showed that the satisfaction
score towards the police dropped to 39.4 out of 100, the lowest since the poll
was started in 2012. According to some reports, the police have become a
symbol that represented hostility and suppression and police's actions on the
protesters has resulted in a breakdown of citizens' trust towards the Force. For
the Force, some lower-ranking officers reported feeling "lost and
confused", citing"a lack of leadership" during important
moments. Some officers also felt that the government has not fully supported
them. A union representing the junior police officers have requested the
Force not to deploy them to "dangerous situations unless management had
confidence in the conditions" and the Force has cancelled foot patrol due
to fear that they may be attacked and the fact that its manpower has been
stretched thin by the ongoing protest.
Domestic reactions
Hong Kong government
The government initially took a hardline approach towards
the protesters and refused to withdraw the bill despite the criticisms from
Hong Kong politicians, Taiwan and foreign envoys. Carrie Lam continued to push the second
reading of the bill despite a mass protest that attracted 1 million people,
saying that the government was "duty-bound" to amend the law. Following
the 12 June conflict, both Police Commissioner Stephen Lo and Lam characterised
the conflict as a "riot". The police later backed down on the claim,
saying that among the protesters, only five of them rioted. Protesters have
since demanded the government to fully retract the riot characterisation. Her
analogy as Hong Kong people's mother attracted criticisms after the violent
crackdown on 12 June.
Lam announced the suspension of the bill on 15 June, though
she insisted that the justification of amending the bill was "sound".
She officially apologised to the public on 16 June following a march that
attracted 338,000 people at its peak according to police, or 2 million people
as claimed by organisers. In early July, Lam reiterated that the bill was
"dead" and reaffirmed that all efforts to amend the law had ceased,
though her use of language was thought to be vague and ambiguous.[272] During
July and August, the government insisted that it would not make any concession,
and that Lam could still lead the government despite calls asking her to
resign. For the demand to set up an independent commission to investigate
police misconduct, she insisted that the existing mechanism, the Independent
Police Complaints Council (IPCC) would suffice.
After condemning the protesters for storming the Legislature
on 1 July for their "use of extreme violence" and defacing the
national emblem during the 21 July protest, Lam suggested in early August that
the protests had derailed from their original purposes and that its goal was to
challenge China's sovereignty and damage "one country, two
systems". She suggested that the radical protesters were
dragging Hong Kong to a "point of no return" and that they had
"no stake in society", a remark that received criticisms from
some civil servants. She also stressed that the government would instead
focus on improving the city's economy and preparing measures to help the
businesses in Hong Kong due to the impending "economic downturn".
Following a rally on 18 August that was attended by more
than 1.7 million people, Lam announced that she would create platforms for
dialogue but continued to reject the five core demands. On 4 September,
Lam announced that she would formally withdraw the extradition bill. She also
announced that she would introduce measures such as introducing new members to
the IPCC, engaging in dialogue in a community level, and inviting academics to
evaluate the deep-rooted problems of Hong Kong. However, protesters and
democrats had previously expressed that a partial concession would not be
accepted and affirmed that all the five core demands must be answered.
Lam's administration received criticisms for their
performance during the protests. Critics condemned Carrie Lam's arrogance and
her extended absence and avoidance of public attention after her apology and
believed that these factors enabled the protests to escalate. According to
polls done by the University of Hong Kong's Public Opinion Program, Lam's
ratings in June dropped to a historic low score of 32.8 out of 100, the lowest
rating ever received by a Chief Executive. In August, the score dropped to
24.6, and other domains ranging from the satisfaction rate to the trust rate in
the government also reached record low. Lam's concession was also criticised
for being "too little, too late", as the conflicts would not have
escalated if she had withdrawn the bill during the early stage of the protest. Ma Ngok, a political scientist at CUHK,
remarked that the government "has lost the trust of a whole
generation" and predicted that the youths would remain angry at both the
government and the police "for years to come".
Pro-Beijing parties
The Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of
Hong Kong (DAB) and the Hong Kong
Federation of Trade Unions (HKFTU), supported Carrie Lam's
amendment of the bill before the mass protests broke out. After Carrie Lam
announced the suspension of the bill, many pro-government lawmakers took
a U-turn with their
view. Starry Lee from DAB claimed that her party
would not oppose the withdrawal of the bill, and the party distanced
itself from Ann Chiang, who claimed
that the government could revive the bill after the summer. Lee disagreed with
setting up an independent commission to investigate the police behaviours as
she felt that it would "dampen their morale". Felix Chung, a lawmaker from Liberal Party,
supported the withdrawal of the bill, though he felt that an independent
commission should be set up to investigate the whole incident. The CE held
a private meeting with pro-government lawmakers explaining the decision to
withdraw the bill, though some lawmakers, including Alice Mak from
HKFTU, were said to have vented her anger toward Lam as her decision may harm
their chances in the upcoming elections.
As protests continued to escalate,
pro-Beijing lawmakers have condemned the violence of the protesters for
breaking into the LegCo Complex and using petrol bombs and unidentified liquids
against the police. They have maintained their support for the Hong Kong
Police Force, and have held various counter-demonstrations to support the
police. On 17 August, a pro-government rally organised by the Safeguard
Hong Kong Alliance occurred in Tamar Park. Organisers said 476,000 people
including pro-government politicians and business leaders joined the
demonstration, but police stated only 108,000 attended.
Members of the Executive Council, Ip Kwok-him and Regina Ip alleged that there was a
"mastermind" behind the protests but could not provide substantial
evidence to support their claim.
Pro-democracy camp
The pro-democratic parties played a
supporting role in the protest, and have opposed the amendment of the bill and
have criticised the Police Force for the alleged misconduct. Many lawmakers,
such as Democratic Party's Roy Kwong, assisted the protesters in various
scenarios. Civic Party's criticised
the government for not responding to the protesters, and described the storming
of the LegCo as the "outburst of people's grievances". Despite
the escalation of the protests, convenor of the pro-democratic lawmakers, Claudia Mo, have insisted that their group of
lawmakers would not split with the protesters despite not agreeing with all of
their methods. Fernando Cheung warned
that Hong Kong was slowly becoming a "police state" with the increasing violence
used by the police.
Both the incidents on 21 July and 31
August were likened to "terrorist attacks" by some pro-democrats. Pro-democrats
also criticised the arrests of several lawmakers before the 31 August protest,
saying that such arrests were an attempt by the police to suppress the
movement, but warned that the police would further "fuel greater
anger". Demosisto's Joshua Wong and Alex Chow said that "Hong Kong people
will not be cowed by the CCP"
and that the arrests of Wong and several other activists on 30 August
"marked another watershed moment in the fast-moving story of Hong Kong's
eroding freedoms".
Several lawmakers, including Dennis Kwok and Alvin Yeung from Civic Party also
travelled to the US to explain and discuss the situation in Hong Kong with
American lawmakers and business leaders and voice their support for the
reintroduction of the Hong Kong Human
Rights and Democracy Act. Meanwhile, some councillors proposed
several alternate versions of the extradition bill.
Former government executives,
including Anson Chan, the former Chief
Secretary for Administration, issued several open letters to Carrie
Lam, urging her to respond to the five core demands raised by protesters.[313] At
the civil servant rally, Joseph Wong, the former Secretary for Civil
Service, said "If we think today's officials, today's chief executive,
violated or failed to follow the rule of law, as civil servants and as
civilians, we have a duty to point it out", responding to the current
Secretary Joshua Law's letter to all
civil servants which requested them to maintain their political neutrality.
Source:
CNN
Comments
Post a Comment